Forum
Aktif konular
Üyeler
Kurallar
Arama
Ingilizce Bilen Bir Göz Ativersin Lütfen... Ingilizce Bilen Bir Göz Ativersin Lütfen...
-
Selam degerli Tahribat Müridlerim,
pazartesi sinavim var, konumuz immigration. Kendim bir comment yazdim
yalniz hatalar vardir. Puan da en cok dilden alinabiliyor, Yani yapacagim her hata bana cok agir sonuclara neden oluyor.
Tahribata su gibi ingilizce yazabiliren müridlerin oldugunu inaniyorum. Insallah bana bu konuda yardimca olurlar. Texti buraya yaziyorum Hatalari düzeltirseniz ve pm olarak bana atabilirseniz cok memnun olurum. Simdideb hepinize tessekür ederim.
Write a comment: Immigration is bad for the country discuss this.
Nowadays immigration us a favourite topic of which there
are has advantege and disadvanteges. It is a fact that
most countries in the EU have problems with the immigration.
In my opinion the counter arguments outweigh the pro arguments.
I would like to start with the pro arguments.
Firstly, the money earned will be spend in the homeland. If the immigrants make vacation they spend the money into their homeland. The money does not remain in the country.
secondly, There is a competition between immigrants and citizens because of the better education or workplaces.
Thirdly, it is problem that not all immigrants has englisch knowledge.
The consequence is that missunderstanding in the company can happen.
Now i want to draw your attention for the counter arguments. It is a benefit for the company, if the employee can speak bilingual languages. The immigrant can communicate with other countries.
A main argument is the country have mor selection of workers.
Maybe the companies can select the best immigrant with the best features.
An another argument is the country obtains different cultures.
There is a cultural exchange wich makes the country more interesting. -
birader yanlis anlama ancak bu duzeltilmez bastan yazilir. dil bilgisine dikkat et, zamanlari karistirmissin onlara bir goz at. ve google'da biraz arastir "pro's and con's of immigration" diye.
-
mtz bunu yazdı:
-----------------------------
birader yanlis anlama ancak bu duzeltilmez bastan yazilir. dil bilgisine dikkat et, zamanlari karistirmissin onlara bir goz at. ve google'da biraz arastir "pro's and con's of immigration" diye.
-----------------------------
aynen hoca oldukça hata var, çok profesyonel yazmaya kasma basit olsun anlamlı olsun
-
türkçe metni yazarsan ceviririm
-
zoom8 bunu yazdı:
-----------------------------Selam degerli Tahribat Müridlerim,
pazartesi sinavim var, konumuz immigration. Kendim bir comment yazdim
yalniz hatalar vardir. Puan da en cok dilden alinabiliyor, Yani yapacagim her hata bana cok agir sonuclara neden oluyor.
Tahribata su gibi ingilizce yazabiliren müridlerin oldugunu inaniyorum. Insallah bana bu konuda yardimca olurlar. Texti buraya yaziyorum Hatalari düzeltirseniz ve pm olarak bana atabilirseniz cok memnun olurum. Simdideb hepinize tessekür ederim.
Write a comment: Immigration is bad for the country discuss this.
Nowadays immigration us a favourite topic of which there
are has advantege and disadvanteges. It is a fact that
most countries in the EU have problems with the immigration.
In my opinion the counter arguments outweigh the pro arguments.
I would like to start with the pro arguments.
Firstly, the money earned will be spend in the homeland. If the immigrants make vacation they spend the money into their homeland. The money does not remain in the country.
secondly, There is a competition between immigrants and citizens because of the better education or workplaces.
Thirdly, it is problem that not all immigrants has englisch knowledge.
The consequence is that missunderstanding in the company can happen.
Now i want to draw your attention for the counter arguments. It is a benefit for the company, if the employee can speak bilingual languages. The immigrant can communicate with other countries.
A main argument is the country have mor selection of workers.
Maybe the companies can select the best immigrant with the best features.
An another argument is the country obtains different cultures.
There is a cultural exchange wich makes the country more interesting.
zoom8 bunu yazdı:
-----------------------------
-----------------------------Selam degerli Tahribat Müridlerim,
pazartesi sinavim var, konumuz immigration. Kendim bir comment yazdim
yalniz hatalar vardir. Puan da en cok dilden alinabiliyor, Yani yapacagim her hata bana cok agir sonuclara neden oluyor.
Tahribata su gibi ingilizce yazabiliren müridlerin oldugunu inaniyorum. Insallah bana bu konuda yardimca olurlar. Texti buraya yaziyorum Hatalari düzeltirseniz ve pm olarak bana atabilirseniz cok memnun olurum. Simdideb hepinize tessekür ederim.
Write a comment: Immigration is bad for the country discuss this.
Nowadays immigration us a favourite topic of which there
are has advantege and disadvanteges. It is a fact that
most countries in the EU have problems with the immigration.
In my opinion the counter arguments outweigh the pro arguments.
I would like to start with the pro arguments.
Firstly, the money earned will be spend in the homeland. If the immigrants make vacation they spend the money into their homeland. The money does not remain in the country.
secondly, There is a competition between immigrants and citizens because of the better education or workplaces.
Thirdly, it is problem that not all immigrants has englisch knowledge.
The consequence is that missunderstanding in the company can happen.
Now i want to draw your attention for the counter arguments. It is a benefit for the company, if the employee can speak bilingual languages. The immigrant can communicate with other countries.
A main argument is the country have mor selection of workers.
Maybe the companies can select the best immigrant with the best features.
An another argument is the country obtains different cultures.
There is a cultural exchange wich makes the country more interesting.
Sana yazayim tercumesini aslanim.Write a comment: Immigration is bad for the country, discuss this. Nowadays immigration is our favourite topic, which has both advantages and disadvantages. It is a fact that most countries that have a membership in the EU have certain problems with the immigration authorities. In my opinion the counter or negative argumentative subjects outweigh and belittle the professional arguments. I would like to start with the professional arguments, first of all the money obtained will be spent in the homeland. If the immigrants go to a vacation, they will secondly spend the money for purposes that suit this positively, there is a conflict between immigrants (newcomers) and citizens because of the better education or places of work. Thirdly, it is a general problem that not all immigrants have a working knowledge of English. The consequence is that there are misunderstandings which may occur in the company or workplace. Now I want to draw your attention to the conflicting arguments. It is very beneficial for the company, if the employee can speak bilingual fluently on both languages. The immigrant can communicate with other foreigners in specific countries of interest. A main argument is that the country has a vast amount of selection of workers. The companies may select the best immigrant with the best skills. An another argument is that the country retrieves different cultural aspects from the individuals who may be working for them. There is cultural exchange which makes the country much more interesting.
----------------------------- -
pazartesi olmus su an kolay gelsin sınavında biraz grammer ögrenmen iyi olur bence :) arkadaş yazmış üstte sagolsun hadi eyv :D
-
Baska bir sualin olursa, ben sana burada daima yardimci olmaya hazirim.
Kısayol
Şikayet
Özel Mesaj
Alıntı yap
Cevapla